
Uber contacted Mission Local after the publication of this article, which has been updated to include the company’s explanation for why it tells drivers that riders pay lower fares than they actually do. The update can be read in the latter part of the subsection “Money Unaccounted For.”
On a July weekday afternoon, I booked an Uber to my Visitacion Valley home, a 2.5-mile trip for $17.16. My driver — we’ll call him Ryan — showed me how much he made: $7.54.
Uber has long claimed that the amount it takes from fares on average, known as a “take rate,” is about 25 percent, yet the driver got just 44 percent of my payment. A cursory Google search can quickly pull up screenshots that show this is nothing new, and many media outlets have collected data shedding insight on the companies’ take rates.
What’s new is the growing appetite of the rideshare companies. Not satisfied with 25 percent, they now appear to need or want more — frequently half of the fare and, in some cases, nearly three times the publicized take rate, according to the bottom line on 20 recent rides.
Perhaps the most exhaustive attempt to track rideshare companies’ take rate was in 2019, when the media outlet Jalopnik examined 14,756 fares and concluded that Uber kept 35 percent of the revenue, while Lyft kept 38 percent. (Uber and Lyft disputed these analyses but did not provide data sets to Jalopnik upon request showing otherwise.)
However, as the supply of rideshare drivers has declined and prices have spiked, the split has become unseemly. The driver’s pay is determined by a base amount, trip duration, trip distance and potential surge pricing, along with incentives such as reaching a certain number of rides within a time frame — and is not determined by what customers pay.
Mission Local decided it was time to again track the companies’ take rates. We booked 20 rides in San Francisco with drivers who shared their pay for our trips. Drivers said demand is indeed back up and prices are higher, but none said they noticed more pay per trip.
The unscientific sampling showed that, of 10 rides, drivers with Uber received an average of 56 percent of what I paid; of 10 with Lyft, drivers received an average of 47 percent of what I paid. Of all 20, drivers took home an average of 52 percent of what I got charged.
To calculate how much Uber and Lyft make from that, some fees have to be taken into account.
For Uber, airports aside, the share is what remains after the city’s tax, or roughly 3.25 percent, generally less than a dollar per ride in San Francisco.
Lyft doesn’t show drivers a fee breakdown per ride beyond what they make. In an email, the company explained that it replaced drivers’ single-ride breakdown with a weekly snapshot of how much riders pay per week. It does this, wrote Lyft, to highlight aggregate earnings and insights rather than individual ride details, which the rideshare company says can be misleading.
Money Unaccounted For
One of my Uber drivers, P.J., showed me on his phone that he was paid $11.47 for a 6-mile ride.
He accessed a cost breakdown that showed a driver pay of $11.47, an Uber service commission of 44 cents and the city fee of 59 cents, all adding up to a “customer price” of $12.50.
But wait — my Uber application said I paid $15.79, about 26 percent more. Huh? That would have given Uber $3.73 — not the above 44-cent service commission.
In five out of five Uber trips where drivers accessed price breakdowns, I paid Uber more than the amount Uber showed drivers that I paid. What I paid was 19.6 percent to 26.3 percent more than what the driver was told by Uber. That would add up to around $3 more per trip.
Eric Dryburgh, field director for the rideshare advocacy organization Rideshare Drivers United, said he’s seen or heard of five or six cases of this.
But it’s hard to keep track of, as drivers don’t usually ask to see riders’ phones, he noted.
Three drivers who have been with the company for multiple years commented on the missing money, and their response was the same: From their experience, it’s not surprising. Added one driver with more than 15,000 rides, “I’ve always known things aren’t always what they seem to be.”
UPDATE: Following multiple requests for comment and after the publication of this article, Uber contacted Mission Local to explain its fee structure. California riders, a spokesperson said, are charged a marketplace fee and a driver benefits fee that are excluded from the fares Uber shows drivers.
The driver benefits fee covers the worker benefits under Proposition 22, a measure passed last November that established drivers as independent contractors while granting them certain benefits, said Zahid Arab, a regional public affairs representative for Uber.
This fee needs some context. Uber and Lyft wrote Proposition 22 and were among a group of gig-economy companies that spent $224 million to support the proposition, so the driver benefits fee, along with the marketplace fee, can be viewed as self-imposed and presumably set by the ridesharing companies.
Asked why drivers’ applications don’t include these fees, Uber said, “drivers see breakdowns that apply to them on the trip.”
Arab, the company spokesperson, added that “Uber’s median take rate has remained the same” — that is, around 25 percent.
But it becomes increasingly unclear what a “take rate” is. After paying the city tax, all that Uber “takes” from the rider’s payment is within Uber’s control. It can then pay its bills from that “take” and keep what is left in profit. However, since Uber has yet to turn a profit, all of its “take” pays bills — from benefits to administrative salaries.
Arab also linked a Twitter thread from company CEO Dara Khosrowshahi disputing the narrative that drivers weren’t getting a bigger cut as ride costs increased.
But drivers in the 20 rides we took were definitely not getting a bigger cut. Uber was getting that. END UPDATE